Purdue College of Pharmacy Experience with Blood Pressure Screenings at the Indiana State Fair

The objective of this community outreach initiative is to develop and implement a student-led blood pressure screening at the Indiana State Fair in conjunction with the Purdue College of Pharmacy and the Hook’s Drug Store Museum. Under the mentorship of two pharmacy faculty members, third- and fourth-year professional PharmD students and pharmacy fellows hold a nine-hour blood pressure screening at the Indiana State Fair each year. The screening is held at the Hook’s Drug Store Museum and the students and fellows sign-up in teams of 3-4 to host the event. Fair-goers visiting the screening have their blood pressure taken using automated blood pressure devices and the readings are recorded into one of three categories: ≤140 mmHg/≤90 mmHg, \u3e140 mmHg/\u3e90 mmHg, or \u3e150 mmHg/\u3e100 mmHg. All patients receive a card with their blood pressure reading, are counseled on hypertension management and possible health complications, and receive a sticker that reads “I had my blood pressure checked at the Indiana State Fair/Purdue College of Pharmacy.” Students complete a reflection following their involvement. Data from the last five years was analyzed. Over the five years, a total of 838 fairgoers have utilized the opportunity to have their blood pressure checked. In addition, 50 pharmacy students, two fellows, and two faculty members have participated in hosting the screening. There has been growing involvement over the years, with 213 individuals visiting the booth in 2019. There has been a steady increase in the percentage of patients with a blood pressure reading in the lowest category. Participation in the Indiana State Fair has become a tradition for the College of Pharmacy as students enjoy and are grateful for such learning opportunities. This initiative allows students to develop and apply their clinical knowledge and communication skills while improving health and awareness of community members

Risk Factors for Bleeding and Clinical Ineffectiveness Associated with Clopidogrel Therapy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Although clopidogrel is a frequently used antiplatelet medication to treat and prevent atherothrombotic disease, clinicians must balance its clinical effectiveness with the potential side effect of bleeding. However, many previous studies have evaluated beneficial and adverse factors separately. The objective of our study was to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies of clopidogrel's clinical effectiveness and/or risk of bleeding in order to identify and assess all reported risk factors, thus helping clinicians to balance patient safety with drug efficacy. We analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of maintenance use in four stages: search for relevant primary articles; abstract and full article screening; quality assessment and data extraction; and synthesis and data analysis. Screening of 7,109 articles yielded 52 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven risk factors were identified. "Definite risk factors" were defined as those with aggregated odds ratios (ORs) > 1 and confidence intervals (CIs) > 1 if analyzed in more than one study. Definite risk factors for major bleeding were concomitant aspirin use (OR 2.83, 95% CI 2.04-3.94) and long duration of clopidogrel therapy (> 6 months) (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.50). Dual antiplatelet therapy, extended clopidogrel therapy, and high maintenance dose (150 mg/day) of clopidogrel were definite risk factors for any bleeding. Reduced renal function, both mild and severe, was the only definite risk factor for clinical ineffectiveness. These findings can help clinicians predict the risks and effectiveness of clopidogrel use for their patients and be used in clinical decision support tools.This study was supported by the Lilly Endowment, Inc. Physician Scientist Initiative and by Indiana University Health and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, funded in part by grant #ULI TR002529 from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Science Award, and The Advances in Medicine (AIM) grant from Cook Medical. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or Cook Medical. MTE was supported by NIH/NIDDK K08DK107864